<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Actual supply verification required before confirming demand and penalty on alleged invoice-only inward supply allegations</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100761</link>
    <description>Demand and penalty for alleged receipt of invoices without actual movement of goods required proof of genuine physical supply, not mere assumptions. Where the taxpayer produced tax invoices along with e-way bills and lorry receipts, the text states that this created a prima facie case and that the authority should have verified the transport records before confirming liability. The demand could not rest on presumptions, conjecture, or ipse dixit; fresh verification of lorry numbers, e-way bills, invoices, and toll passage was required. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remitted for a fresh decision on merits after such verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 09:24:26 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 09:24:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=906837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Actual supply verification required before confirming demand and penalty on alleged invoice-only inward supply allegations</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100761</link>
      <description>Demand and penalty for alleged receipt of invoices without actual movement of goods required proof of genuine physical supply, not mere assumptions. Where the taxpayer produced tax invoices along with e-way bills and lorry receipts, the text states that this created a prima facie case and that the authority should have verified the transport records before confirming liability. The demand could not rest on presumptions, conjecture, or ipse dixit; fresh verification of lorry numbers, e-way bills, invoices, and toll passage was required. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remitted for a fresh decision on merits after such verification.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 09:24:26 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>