https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793319 Interim moratorium under Section 96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code stayed the debt itself, so continuation of arbitration against the guarantors was unsustainable and the awards were liable to be set aside. Refusal to allow cross-examination of the Bank's witness in a contested claim, where execution of the guarantee was disputed, breached natural justice and the requirement of a full opportunity to present the case. Section 34 interference was not warranted on stamp duty, membership, or contractual discharge findings, but the claim-proof finding could not stand because it was not properly tested. Directions enforcing mortgage-related reliefs were non-arbitrable, as mortgage enforcement is a right in rem. en-us Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Jun 2026 08:36:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793319 Interim moratorium under Section 96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code stayed the debt itself, so continuation of arbitration against the guarantors was unsustainable and the awards were liable to be set aside. Refusal to allow cross-examination of the Bank's witness in a contested claim, where execution of the guarantee was disputed, breached natural justice and the requirement of a full opportunity to present the case. Section 34 interference was not warranted on stamp duty, membership, or contractual discharge findings, but the claim-proof finding could not stand because it was not properly tested. Directions enforcing mortgage-related reliefs were non-arbitrable, as mortgage enforcement is a right in rem. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793319