<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 707 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793326</link>
    <description>50% of the capital cost collected upfront for water supply infrastructure in respect of 99-year industrial plot leases was treated as a one-time upfront amount covered by the Section 104 exemption for long-term industrial leases. Because the same component had earlier been dropped on identical reasoning and that departmental position was not shown to have been challenged, the service tax demand for the present period could not be sustained. The consequential interest and penalty demands also failed and were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 08:36:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=906792" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 707 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793326</link>
      <description>50% of the capital cost collected upfront for water supply infrastructure in respect of 99-year industrial plot leases was treated as a one-time upfront amount covered by the Section 104 exemption for long-term industrial leases. Because the same component had earlier been dropped on identical reasoning and that departmental position was not shown to have been challenged, the service tax demand for the present period could not be sustained. The consequential interest and penalty demands also failed and were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>