https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793333 An appeal against a liquidation-compliance order directing handover of possession was held not maintainable where the order was merely consequential to earlier directions already affirmed in appeal and the possession issue had already been worked out. The tribunal noted that the later order had no independent legal existence because possession of the asset had already been taken. The tenant's separate possession-related objections and inter se rights against the auction purchaser were held to lie outside the scope of the liquidation proceedings and could be raised before the appropriate forum. The purchaser's rights were recognised as arising from the sale process and liquidation orders. en-us Mon, 03 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Jun 2026 08:36:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793333 An appeal against a liquidation-compliance order directing handover of possession was held not maintainable where the order was merely consequential to earlier directions already affirmed in appeal and the possession issue had already been worked out. The tribunal noted that the later order had no independent legal existence because possession of the asset had already been taken. The tenant's separate possession-related objections and inter se rights against the auction purchaser were held to lie outside the scope of the liquidation proceedings and could be raised before the appropriate forum. The purchaser's rights were recognised as arising from the sale process and liquidation orders. Case-Laws IBC Mon, 03 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793333