<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 718 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793337</link>
    <description>Prescribed sampling under IS 436 is essential to determine imported coal&#039;s eligibility for customs exemption benefits. Sampling that does not follow the prescribed method cannot support a legally reliable test report, and the importer&#039;s representative&#039;s presence does not cure that defect because acquiescence cannot validate an unlawful procedure. Where load-port and laboratory test results materially differ, a justified request for independent re-testing requires consideration, particularly when delayed communication of the laboratory report explains the timing of the request. The exemption benefit remained available because the defective sampling report could not be relied upon and re-testing was warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 08:36:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=906781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 718 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793337</link>
      <description>Prescribed sampling under IS 436 is essential to determine imported coal&#039;s eligibility for customs exemption benefits. Sampling that does not follow the prescribed method cannot support a legally reliable test report, and the importer&#039;s representative&#039;s presence does not cure that defect because acquiescence cannot validate an unlawful procedure. Where load-port and laboratory test results materially differ, a justified request for independent re-testing requires consideration, particularly when delayed communication of the laboratory report explains the timing of the request. The exemption benefit remained available because the defective sampling report could not be relied upon and re-testing was warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793337</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>