<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 721 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793340</link>
    <description>Provisional release of seized goods remained subject to the bank guarantee required in the release order, as prima facie material suggested smuggling and the goods bore foreign-origin markings. On that basis, the Delhi HC declined to reduce the guarantee. The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petitions, leaving the provisional release conditions undisturbed and disposing of pending applications, if any.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 08:36:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=906778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 721 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793340</link>
      <description>Provisional release of seized goods remained subject to the bank guarantee required in the release order, as prima facie material suggested smuggling and the goods bore foreign-origin markings. On that basis, the Delhi HC declined to reduce the guarantee. The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petitions, leaving the provisional release conditions undisturbed and disposing of pending applications, if any.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793340</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>