<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1725 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469275</link>
    <description>Simultaneous or antecedent authorisations for audit and assessment were treated as impermissible where the assessment power was meant to arise only after the audit outcome. The text states that earlier Division Bench decisions required the audit process to precede any assessment authorisation, and that a further assessment authorisation could issue only after shortcomings were noticed in audit. On that footing, an assessment based on same-day audit and assessment authorisations was held unsustainable for want of jurisdiction, the assessment order was set aside, and fresh adjudication was directed by the competent territorial officer after hearing the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 08:36:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=906737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1725 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469275</link>
      <description>Simultaneous or antecedent authorisations for audit and assessment were treated as impermissible where the assessment power was meant to arise only after the audit outcome. The text states that earlier Division Bench decisions required the audit process to precede any assessment authorisation, and that a further assessment authorisation could issue only after shortcomings were noticed in audit. On that footing, an assessment based on same-day audit and assessment authorisations was held unsustainable for want of jurisdiction, the assessment order was set aside, and fresh adjudication was directed by the competent territorial officer after hearing the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469275</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>