<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1817 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469277</link>
    <description>The writ petition was disposed of by permitting the petitioner to pursue the statutory remedy before the Additional Deputy Commissioner. The period spent in the writ proceedings was directed to be excluded for limitation purposes, so the petitioner would not be prejudiced by the time consumed in the writ forum. No additional pre-deposit was insisted upon as a condition for filing the appeal, preserving access to the appellate remedy without fresh financial burden.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 08:36:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=906735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1817 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469277</link>
      <description>The writ petition was disposed of by permitting the petitioner to pursue the statutory remedy before the Additional Deputy Commissioner. The period spent in the writ proceedings was directed to be excluded for limitation purposes, so the petitioner would not be prejudiced by the time consumed in the writ forum. No additional pre-deposit was insisted upon as a condition for filing the appeal, preserving access to the appellate remedy without fresh financial burden.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>