https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469280 Adverse remarks against the resolution professional were not expunged because the plea of non-service of notice was contradicted by the appellant's own letter acknowledging receipt, and the claim that notice was noticed only during routine inspection was also undermined. The challenge on the ground that the earlier application had not been pursued was rejected because no effective follow-up was shown after filing. The natural justice objection based on reliance on the IBBI order failed since the authenticity of that order was not disputed, and the absence of a further opportunity did not change the position. The impugned order was upheld and the appeal failed. en-us Wed, 03 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Jun 2026 08:36:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469280 Adverse remarks against the resolution professional were not expunged because the plea of non-service of notice was contradicted by the appellant's own letter acknowledging receipt, and the claim that notice was noticed only during routine inspection was also undermined. The challenge on the ground that the earlier application had not been pursued was rejected because no effective follow-up was shown after filing. The natural justice objection based on reliance on the IBBI order failed since the authenticity of that order was not disputed, and the absence of a further opportunity did not change the position. The impugned order was upheld and the appeal failed. Case-Laws IBC Wed, 03 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469280