https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469281 Service of a demand notice under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is not disproved merely because the tracking record shows an incorrect pin code, where delivery at the correct address is otherwise established. The finding of non-service on that basis was unsustainable. The maintainability of a Section 9 application also had to be tested by excluding disputed invoices and examining whether the undisputed invoice value still met the statutory minimum default threshold. That issue had not been properly examined and required fresh consideration. The matter was therefore remitted for a new decision on service of notice and threshold compliance. en-us Mon, 15 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Jun 2026 08:36:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469281 Service of a demand notice under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is not disproved merely because the tracking record shows an incorrect pin code, where delivery at the correct address is otherwise established. The finding of non-service on that basis was unsustainable. The maintainability of a Section 9 application also had to be tested by excluding disputed invoices and examining whether the undisputed invoice value still met the statutory minimum default threshold. That issue had not been properly examined and required fresh consideration. The matter was therefore remitted for a new decision on service of notice and threshold compliance. Case-Laws IBC Mon, 15 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469281