https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52195 The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, ruling that the Commissioner erred in denying the appellant's claim for deduction under Section 4(4)(d)(ii). The order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed. Additionally, the Tribunal determined that the appellant was entitled to a refund of the amount deposited during the investigation and as a pre-deposit, totaling Rs. 18 lakhs, to be paid within three months from the date of the order. en-us Mon, 09 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Oct 2010 11:29:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52195 The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, ruling that the Commissioner erred in denying the appellant's claim for deduction under Section 4(4)(d)(ii). The order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed. Additionally, the Tribunal determined that the appellant was entitled to a refund of the amount deposited during the investigation and as a pre-deposit, totaling Rs. 18 lakhs, to be paid within three months from the date of the order. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 09 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52195