https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469294 Where a GST demand arising from a post-GST works contract was already covered by binding earlier High Court rulings, the impugned show cause notice and order in original under section 74 were quashed. The Court applied those earlier directions to hold that the concerned authority must rectify and withdraw the demand, reimburse the GST and differential tax amount, and execute a supplementary tender agreement where required to reflect the revised work value. The relief was granted in line with the Court's prior decisions governing reimbursement of GST and tax differential in works contract disputes. en-us Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Jun 2026 08:36:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469294 Where a GST demand arising from a post-GST works contract was already covered by binding earlier High Court rulings, the impugned show cause notice and order in original under section 74 were quashed. The Court applied those earlier directions to hold that the concerned authority must rectify and withdraw the demand, reimburse the GST and differential tax amount, and execute a supplementary tender agreement where required to reflect the revised work value. The relief was granted in line with the Court's prior decisions governing reimbursement of GST and tax differential in works contract disputes. Case-Laws GST Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469294