<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (6) TMI 117 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52191</link>
    <description>The Tribunal condoned the 72-day delay in filing the appeal due to the appellant&#039;s health issues and allowed the Miscellaneous Application. The Tribunal set aside the personal penalty of Rs. 1.00 lakh imposed on the appellant as the case against the appellant was solely based on uncorroborated evidence from the driver, which was deemed insufficient. The appeal was allowed, and the Miscellaneous Application and Stay Petition were disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 11:20:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (6) TMI 117 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52191</link>
      <description>The Tribunal condoned the 72-day delay in filing the appeal due to the appellant&#039;s health issues and allowed the Miscellaneous Application. The Tribunal set aside the personal penalty of Rs. 1.00 lakh imposed on the appellant as the case against the appellant was solely based on uncorroborated evidence from the driver, which was deemed insufficient. The appeal was allowed, and the Miscellaneous Application and Stay Petition were disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>