https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793313 Special bail restrictions under the UAPA and NDPS Act are noted as yielding to Article 21 where custody becomes unduly prolonged and the trial is unlikely to finish within a reasonable time. The text treats K.A. Najeeb as binding and states that the rigour of Section 43D(5) of the UAPA can melt down in such circumstances, while the narrower reading in later two-Judge decisions is not controlling. It also records that prolonged custody, the large number of remaining witnesses, the absence of recovery, the police-statement-based nature of the material, and the absence of shown antecedents supported bail pending trial. en-us Mon, 18 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Jun 2026 18:30:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793313 Special bail restrictions under the UAPA and NDPS Act are noted as yielding to Article 21 where custody becomes unduly prolonged and the trial is unlikely to finish within a reasonable time. The text treats K.A. Najeeb as binding and states that the rigour of Section 43D(5) of the UAPA can melt down in such circumstances, while the narrower reading in later two-Judge decisions is not controlling. It also records that prolonged custody, the large number of remaining witnesses, the absence of recovery, the police-statement-based nature of the material, and the absence of shown antecedents supported bail pending trial. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 18 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793313