<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 224 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52188</link>
    <description>A refund claim for excess customs duty was denied in cash because the claimant failed to rebut the statutory presumption of unjust enrichment. Mere assertions that the duty element was reflected in purchase accounts and that profits were reduced were held insufficient. In the absence of cogent evidence showing that the burden had not been passed on to customers and that the final product price remained unaffected, the bar on cash refund applied. The amount was therefore correctly credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund, and the challenge to the refund order failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 11:15:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 224 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52188</link>
      <description>A refund claim for excess customs duty was denied in cash because the claimant failed to rebut the statutory presumption of unjust enrichment. Mere assertions that the duty element was reflected in purchase accounts and that profits were reduced were held insufficient. In the absence of cogent evidence showing that the burden had not been passed on to customers and that the final product price remained unaffected, the bar on cash refund applied. The amount was therefore correctly credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund, and the challenge to the refund order failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>