<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 637 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793256</link>
    <description>Adjustment of tax paid under the A.P. VAT Act against a demand under the Central Sales Tax Act required consideration by the tax authority in accordance with law. The authority was directed to decide the adjustment contention within six weeks. The demand notice remained stayed pending that consideration, preventing enforcement until the adjustment claim was addressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 08:44:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=906657" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 637 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793256</link>
      <description>Adjustment of tax paid under the A.P. VAT Act against a demand under the Central Sales Tax Act required consideration by the tax authority in accordance with law. The authority was directed to decide the adjustment contention within six weeks. The demand notice remained stayed pending that consideration, preventing enforcement until the adjustment claim was addressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>