<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 645 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793264</link>
    <description>In PMLA regular bail proceedings, the Delhi HC applied the twin conditions under Section 45 and held that they were not satisfied. The Court considered allegations relating to forged bank guarantees, supporting endorsements, electronic communications, statements recorded under Section 50, and other investigative material. It found that disputes over the applicant&#039;s knowledge, role, and the alleged absence of proceeds of crime raised factual issues for trial, but the enforcement material could not be ignored at the bail stage. On the material available, the Court was not satisfied that there were reasonable grounds to believe the applicant was not guilty, and regular bail was declined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 08:44:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=906649" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 645 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793264</link>
      <description>In PMLA regular bail proceedings, the Delhi HC applied the twin conditions under Section 45 and held that they were not satisfied. The Court considered allegations relating to forged bank guarantees, supporting endorsements, electronic communications, statements recorded under Section 50, and other investigative material. It found that disputes over the applicant&#039;s knowledge, role, and the alleged absence of proceeds of crime raised factual issues for trial, but the enforcement material could not be ignored at the bail stage. On the material available, the Court was not satisfied that there were reasonable grounds to believe the applicant was not guilty, and regular bail was declined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>