https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793268 The SC, by consent of the parties, referred a company dispute to arbitration after accepting that the controversy was better suited to arbitral adjudication. A sole arbitrator was appointed, Delhi was fixed as the seat of arbitration, and the arbitrator's fee was left to be settled in consultation with the parties. The earlier NCLT and NCLAT orders on maintainability were expressly set aside, and all contentions were kept open. The appeal was disposed of on the basis of the parties' consensus. en-us Mon, 08 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Jun 2026 18:34:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793268 The SC, by consent of the parties, referred a company dispute to arbitration after accepting that the controversy was better suited to arbitral adjudication. A sole arbitrator was appointed, Delhi was fixed as the seat of arbitration, and the arbitrator's fee was left to be settled in consultation with the parties. The earlier NCLT and NCLAT orders on maintainability were expressly set aside, and all contentions were kept open. The appeal was disposed of on the basis of the parties' consensus. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 08 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793268