<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 652 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793271</link>
    <description>Where a sole appellant dies during pendency of an appeal, Rule 22 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules provides that the appeal abates unless a successor-in-interest or legal representative applies for continuance within the prescribed time. In the absence of any such application, proceedings cannot lawfully continue against a dead person, as that would offend natural justice. The stated result is that the appeal abated on the appellant&#039;s death and could not be continued.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 08:44:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=906642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 652 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793271</link>
      <description>Where a sole appellant dies during pendency of an appeal, Rule 22 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules provides that the appeal abates unless a successor-in-interest or legal representative applies for continuance within the prescribed time. In the absence of any such application, proceedings cannot lawfully continue against a dead person, as that would offend natural justice. The stated result is that the appeal abated on the appellant&#039;s death and could not be continued.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793271</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>