<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 668 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793287</link>
    <description>Cash deposits during the demonetisation period were examined against section 68, with the key question being whether deposits claimed to arise from recorded sales could be treated as unexplained income. The note states that where cash book entries, sale records, audited accounts, stock registers and VAT returns supported the turnover, and the books were not rejected or shown to contain specific defects, the deposits were not to be treated as unexplained cash credits. It further records that Form-F declarations and accepted VAT assessments reinforced the genuineness of inter-branch stock movements and the source of cash. The stated result was deletion of the addition because the revenue relied only on suspicion and sales-pattern anomalies without contrary material.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 08:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=906626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 668 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793287</link>
      <description>Cash deposits during the demonetisation period were examined against section 68, with the key question being whether deposits claimed to arise from recorded sales could be treated as unexplained income. The note states that where cash book entries, sale records, audited accounts, stock registers and VAT returns supported the turnover, and the books were not rejected or shown to contain specific defects, the deposits were not to be treated as unexplained cash credits. It further records that Form-F declarations and accepted VAT assessments reinforced the genuineness of inter-branch stock movements and the source of cash. The stated result was deletion of the addition because the revenue relied only on suspicion and sales-pattern anomalies without contrary material.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793287</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>