<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 680 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793299</link>
    <description>A constitutional challenge to provisions of the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 was entertained, and the HC issued rule because similar writ petitions on the same or connected issues were already pending with rule and interim relief. Pending final hearing, the Court protected the petitioner from coercive action, including prosecution and penalty, while allowing the appeal already filed before the CIT(A) to continue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 08:45:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=906614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 680 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793299</link>
      <description>A constitutional challenge to provisions of the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 was entertained, and the HC issued rule because similar writ petitions on the same or connected issues were already pending with rule and interim relief. Pending final hearing, the Court protected the petitioner from coercive action, including prosecution and penalty, while allowing the appeal already filed before the CIT(A) to continue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793299</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>