<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 692 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793311</link>
    <description>In a review arising from seizure of cash during a GST search, the SC considered the scope of seizure powers under the search-and-seizure framework. The delay in filing the review petitions was condoned, but the Court dismissed the petitions because no ground for review of the earlier order was made out. The operative result was that the prior order remained undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 08:45:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=906602" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 692 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793311</link>
      <description>In a review arising from seizure of cash during a GST search, the SC considered the scope of seizure powers under the search-and-seizure framework. The delay in filing the review petitions was condoned, but the Court dismissed the petitions because no ground for review of the earlier order was made out. The operative result was that the prior order remained undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793311</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>