<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 693 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793312</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail in a fraudulent Input Tax Credit case arising under the CGST/CGGST Act, 2017 was refused by the HC, and the SC found no reason to interfere with that order. The Court treated the matter as one involving offences under Sections 69 and 132 and left the rejection of anticipatory bail undisturbed. The Special Leave Petition was dismissed, and the pending applications were disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 08:45:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=906601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 693 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793312</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail in a fraudulent Input Tax Credit case arising under the CGST/CGGST Act, 2017 was refused by the HC, and the SC found no reason to interfere with that order. The Court treated the matter as one involving offences under Sections 69 and 132 and left the rejection of anticipatory bail undisturbed. The Special Leave Petition was dismissed, and the pending applications were disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793312</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>