<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1825 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469255</link>
    <description>Under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999, a bail court must confine itself to the statutory conditions under Section 21(4) and avoid recording merits-based findings on the evidence. The bail order in question was unsustainable because it went beyond that limited inquiry, assessed the sufficiency of investigative material, and commented on the accused persons&#039; roles and alleged lack of contact with the syndicate. Such premature appreciation of evidence at the bail stage was impermissible and could prejudice the prosecution and the fairness of trial. The order was set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 12:46:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=906565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1825 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469255</link>
      <description>Under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999, a bail court must confine itself to the statutory conditions under Section 21(4) and avoid recording merits-based findings on the evidence. The bail order in question was unsustainable because it went beyond that limited inquiry, assessed the sufficiency of investigative material, and commented on the accused persons&#039; roles and alleged lack of contact with the syndicate. Such premature appreciation of evidence at the bail stage was impermissible and could prejudice the prosecution and the fairness of trial. The order was set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>