<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Bona fide input tax credit cannot be denied for supplier default; collusive transactions may still be challenged.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100694</link>
    <description>Input tax credit cannot be denied to a bona fide purchasing dealer merely because the supplier failed to deposit the tax collected, where the purchaser dealt with a registered supplier and complied with statutory requirements. The Department&#039;s remedy lies against the defaulting supplier, not by imposing vicarious liability on the purchaser or raising a consequential demand against a genuine transaction. The denial may still be revisited if material shows the purchases were not bona fide or were entered into in collusion with the supplier; on that footing, the impugned demand order was set aside with liberty to proceed afresh in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 11:50:08 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 11:50:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=906531" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Bona fide input tax credit cannot be denied for supplier default; collusive transactions may still be challenged.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100694</link>
      <description>Input tax credit cannot be denied to a bona fide purchasing dealer merely because the supplier failed to deposit the tax collected, where the purchaser dealt with a registered supplier and complied with statutory requirements. The Department&#039;s remedy lies against the defaulting supplier, not by imposing vicarious liability on the purchaser or raising a consequential demand against a genuine transaction. The denial may still be revisited if material shows the purchases were not bona fide or were entered into in collusion with the supplier; on that footing, the impugned demand order was set aside with liberty to proceed afresh in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 11:50:08 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100694</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>