<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 2032 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469242</link>
    <description>Assessment proceedings under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act were initiated after the original five-year limitation period for Section 25(1) had expired. The later amendment extending the initiation period to six years, including the third proviso inserted from 01.04.2017, could not validate proceedings already time-barred when commenced. The assessment was therefore held unsustainable on limitation, and the challenge succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:41:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=906503" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 2032 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469242</link>
      <description>Assessment proceedings under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act were initiated after the original five-year limitation period for Section 25(1) had expired. The later amendment extending the initiation period to six years, including the third proviso inserted from 01.04.2017, could not validate proceedings already time-barred when commenced. The assessment was therefore held unsustainable on limitation, and the challenge succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>