<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 582 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793201</link>
    <description>A first appellate authority must independently examine the grounds of appeal, evidence and governing provisions and give a reasoned order. A blanket affirmation of the adjudication order, without discussion of the issues raised, is a non-speaking order and cannot stand. The authority also should not travel beyond the scope of the appeal by deciding matters not under challenge. Here, the appellate order on quantity discount and price support or price difference discount in provisional assessments was found unsustainable, and the matter was remanded for fresh decision on merits after independent consideration of all grounds and submissions; deductions already allowed in the original adjudication were left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 08:32:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=906462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 582 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793201</link>
      <description>A first appellate authority must independently examine the grounds of appeal, evidence and governing provisions and give a reasoned order. A blanket affirmation of the adjudication order, without discussion of the issues raised, is a non-speaking order and cannot stand. The authority also should not travel beyond the scope of the appeal by deciding matters not under challenge. Here, the appellate order on quantity discount and price support or price difference discount in provisional assessments was found unsustainable, and the matter was remanded for fresh decision on merits after independent consideration of all grounds and submissions; deductions already allowed in the original adjudication were left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>