https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793204 Article 226(2) permits a writ only where part of the cause of action arises within the State, but a mere Kerala connection to the loan transaction was insufficient to found jurisdiction. Insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code were initiated before the National Company Law Tribunal at the place of the corporate debtor's registered office in New Delhi, and the statutory scheme under Sections 95 and 60 governed territorial jurisdiction. The Kerala High Court therefore lacked territorial jurisdiction to entertain the writ challenge to those insolvency proceedings, and the petition was dismissed as not maintainable. en-us Mon, 25 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Jun 2026 08:32:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793204 Article 226(2) permits a writ only where part of the cause of action arises within the State, but a mere Kerala connection to the loan transaction was insufficient to found jurisdiction. Insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code were initiated before the National Company Law Tribunal at the place of the corporate debtor's registered office in New Delhi, and the statutory scheme under Sections 95 and 60 governed territorial jurisdiction. The Kerala High Court therefore lacked territorial jurisdiction to entertain the writ challenge to those insolvency proceedings, and the petition was dismissed as not maintainable. Case-Laws IBC Mon, 25 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793204