<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 607 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793226</link>
    <description>In bogus purchase cases involving an accommodation entry provider, the taxable addition is confined to the profit element embedded in the purchases rather than the full purchase value. The addition may be estimated by reference to the assessee&#039;s normal profit rate, with reasonable adjustment for the facts. Applying that settled approach, the entire purchase amount could not be treated as income, and only the embedded profit element was added to income. The matter was decided in favour of the assessee to that extent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 08:33:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=906437" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 607 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793226</link>
      <description>In bogus purchase cases involving an accommodation entry provider, the taxable addition is confined to the profit element embedded in the purchases rather than the full purchase value. The addition may be estimated by reference to the assessee&#039;s normal profit rate, with reasonable adjustment for the facts. Applying that settled approach, the entire purchase amount could not be treated as income, and only the embedded profit element was added to income. The matter was decided in favour of the assessee to that extent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793226</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>