<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 611 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793230</link>
    <description>Deduction for dividend income is computed on net dividend, but no expenditure is disallowable where sufficient own funds financed the dividend-yielding investments rather than interest-bearing borrowings. For scheduled banks, the bad-debt deduction rules distinguish urban advances written off under section 36(1)(vii) from rural advances covered by section 36(1)(viia), with the proviso preventing double deduction only for the latter. Bank-held securities are stock-in-trade, making purchase interest and broken-period interest revenue expenditure. Similarly, sufficient own funds preclude proportionate disallowance of expenditure against exempt bond income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 08:33:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=906433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 611 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793230</link>
      <description>Deduction for dividend income is computed on net dividend, but no expenditure is disallowable where sufficient own funds financed the dividend-yielding investments rather than interest-bearing borrowings. For scheduled banks, the bad-debt deduction rules distinguish urban advances written off under section 36(1)(vii) from rural advances covered by section 36(1)(viia), with the proviso preventing double deduction only for the latter. Bank-held securities are stock-in-trade, making purchase interest and broken-period interest revenue expenditure. Similarly, sufficient own funds preclude proportionate disallowance of expenditure against exempt bond income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793230</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>