https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793239 The writ petition challenging a GST adjudication order and consequential recovery proceedings was not entertained because the statutory remedy remained available and the challenge was brought after more than two years. Relying on Glaxo Smith Kline Consumer Health Care Ltd., the HC held that such delay weighed against invocation of writ jurisdiction and dismissed the petition, while leaving the petitioner free to approach the statutory authority if permissible in law. en-us Mon, 23 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Jun 2026 08:33:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793239 The writ petition challenging a GST adjudication order and consequential recovery proceedings was not entertained because the statutory remedy remained available and the challenge was brought after more than two years. Relying on Glaxo Smith Kline Consumer Health Care Ltd., the HC held that such delay weighed against invocation of writ jurisdiction and dismissed the petition, while leaving the petitioner free to approach the statutory authority if permissible in law. Case-Laws GST Mon, 23 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793239