https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793243 The writ petition was not entertained because an effective statutory appeal lay under Section 112 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 before the GST Appellate Tribunal. The Court declined to examine the challenge to the appellate order on merits, including the grievance that the suppliers had treated B2B supplies as B2C supplies or quoted the wrong GSTIN of the recipient, and left all questions of law and fact open for the Tribunal. The petitioner was given liberty to pursue the statutory appellate remedy on compliance with the prescribed pre-deposit, without any expression on the merits. en-us Wed, 06 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Jun 2026 08:33:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793243 The writ petition was not entertained because an effective statutory appeal lay under Section 112 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 before the GST Appellate Tribunal. The Court declined to examine the challenge to the appellate order on merits, including the grievance that the suppliers had treated B2B supplies as B2C supplies or quoted the wrong GSTIN of the recipient, and left all questions of law and fact open for the Tribunal. The petitioner was given liberty to pursue the statutory appellate remedy on compliance with the prescribed pre-deposit, without any expression on the merits. Case-Laws GST Wed, 06 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793243