<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 2031 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469213</link>
    <description>Notification No. 108/95-CE exemption remained available for goods supplied against project certificates for execution of World Bank financed projects. Explanation 2 inserted by Notification No. 13/2008-CE was held prospective and could not be used to deny exemption for clearances made before its insertion. For the post-insertion period, the explanation was construed to mean only that project goods must not be withdrawn during execution of the project; it did not require the goods to become a permanent part of the completed project. On that construction, the exemption applied and the adverse orders and demand were unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 20:06:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=906398" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 2031 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469213</link>
      <description>Notification No. 108/95-CE exemption remained available for goods supplied against project certificates for execution of World Bank financed projects. Explanation 2 inserted by Notification No. 13/2008-CE was held prospective and could not be used to deny exemption for clearances made before its insertion. For the post-insertion period, the explanation was construed to mean only that project goods must not be withdrawn during execution of the project; it did not require the goods to become a permanent part of the completed project. On that construction, the exemption applied and the adverse orders and demand were unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>