<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1713 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469234</link>
    <description>Interest paid on borrowed funds was treated as allowable where the loans and advances had already been accepted by the Revenue, the interest rate was undisputed, and search proceedings yielded no incriminating material against the expenditure for the year under appeal. On those facts, the interest payment to the lender could not be characterised as non-genuine, and the addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 20:06:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=906377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1713 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469234</link>
      <description>Interest paid on borrowed funds was treated as allowable where the loans and advances had already been accepted by the Revenue, the interest rate was undisputed, and search proceedings yielded no incriminating material against the expenditure for the year under appeal. On those facts, the interest payment to the lender could not be characterised as non-genuine, and the addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469234</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>