https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469207 Under MCOCA, the requirement of more than one charge-sheet under Section 2(d) is assessed by reference to the syndicate's continuing unlawful activity, not each member individually. A facilitator or abettor may also fall within the Act if the material shows nexus with the organised crime syndicate and assistance in continuing the crime. Challenges to confessional statements under Section 18, procedural compliance, retraction, and sanction under Section 23 were treated as matters for trial and not as grounds to displace the bail test under Section 21(4). On the material, the applicants were found prima facie involved in channelising extorted funds and laundering crime proceeds, so bail was declined. en-us Tue, 11 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Jun 2026 16:57:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469207 Under MCOCA, the requirement of more than one charge-sheet under Section 2(d) is assessed by reference to the syndicate's continuing unlawful activity, not each member individually. A facilitator or abettor may also fall within the Act if the material shows nexus with the organised crime syndicate and assistance in continuing the crime. Challenges to confessional statements under Section 18, procedural compliance, retraction, and sanction under Section 23 were treated as matters for trial and not as grounds to displace the bail test under Section 21(4). On the material, the applicants were found prima facie involved in channelising extorted funds and laundering crime proceeds, so bail was declined. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 11 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469207