<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 518 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793137</link>
    <description>A foreign judgment can be treated as conclusive only if it survives the exceptions in Section 13 CPC, and the presumption under Section 14 is rebuttable. At the pre-trial stage, the court must be prima facie satisfied that the foreign court was competent and that no disqualifying defect exists before relying on the judgment for a money claim. Here, the arbitration agreement, prior participation in international arbitration over the same dispute, and objections based on the Russian proceedings created serious doubt about the foreign court&#039;s competence and fairness. Without a reliable prima facie foundation for the underlying claim, apprehension of asset dissipation in India did not justify interim injunction relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 07:26:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=906326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 518 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793137</link>
      <description>A foreign judgment can be treated as conclusive only if it survives the exceptions in Section 13 CPC, and the presumption under Section 14 is rebuttable. At the pre-trial stage, the court must be prima facie satisfied that the foreign court was competent and that no disqualifying defect exists before relying on the judgment for a money claim. Here, the arbitration agreement, prior participation in international arbitration over the same dispute, and objections based on the Russian proceedings created serious doubt about the foreign court&#039;s competence and fairness. Without a reliable prima facie foundation for the underlying claim, apprehension of asset dissipation in India did not justify interim injunction relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>