<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 543 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793162</link>
    <description>Additions and transfer pricing adjustments were addressed on evidence-based principles: commission paid to a foreign procurement facilitator was not treated as the assessees&#039; undisclosed income because the entity was genuine and no diversion of profits was proved; balance credit card expenditure was allowed where substantial suo motu disallowance had already been made and no specific personal use was shown; section 40A(3) disallowance was deleted for want of person-specific, day-specific breach, though unsupported cash expenditure remained partly disallowed; obsolete stock was valued at realizable value without proof of suppression; the unaccounted scrap and Grade-B shoe issue required fresh verification; and several transfer pricing exclusions and adjustments were deleted or recomputed on operating margin, symmetry, and benchmarking principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 15:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=906301" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 543 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793162</link>
      <description>Additions and transfer pricing adjustments were addressed on evidence-based principles: commission paid to a foreign procurement facilitator was not treated as the assessees&#039; undisclosed income because the entity was genuine and no diversion of profits was proved; balance credit card expenditure was allowed where substantial suo motu disallowance had already been made and no specific personal use was shown; section 40A(3) disallowance was deleted for want of person-specific, day-specific breach, though unsupported cash expenditure remained partly disallowed; obsolete stock was valued at realizable value without proof of suppression; the unaccounted scrap and Grade-B shoe issue required fresh verification; and several transfer pricing exclusions and adjustments were deleted or recomputed on operating margin, symmetry, and benchmarking principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>