<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 551 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793170</link>
    <description>Reassessment beyond the ordinary limitation period requires the Revenue to show a live, year-specific nexus between the material in its possession and escaped income represented by an asset, expenditure, or a books entry; seized cash-book extracts alone, without proper application of mind, were held insufficient to sustain jurisdiction. On the profit issue, the Tribunal examined seized records, statements, retractions, and corroborative material, and rejected a blanket inference that all entries required adding two zeroes. However, it accepted that specific receipts supported by independent material could justify such adjustment for those items, while sustaining a 16% profit estimation on the unaccounted business where the assessee failed to establish a lower workable rate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 14:25:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=906293" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 551 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793170</link>
      <description>Reassessment beyond the ordinary limitation period requires the Revenue to show a live, year-specific nexus between the material in its possession and escaped income represented by an asset, expenditure, or a books entry; seized cash-book extracts alone, without proper application of mind, were held insufficient to sustain jurisdiction. On the profit issue, the Tribunal examined seized records, statements, retractions, and corroborative material, and rejected a blanket inference that all entries required adding two zeroes. However, it accepted that specific receipts supported by independent material could justify such adjustment for those items, while sustaining a 16% profit estimation on the unaccounted business where the assessee failed to establish a lower workable rate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793170</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>