https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793189 A writ petition challenging a GST adjudication order was not entertained because it was filed more than 14 months after the order was uploaded on the portal and the petitioner showed no periodic portal checks or departmental follow-up. The Court held that lack of asserted knowledge did not excuse the delay, and that the proper remedy was to file a statutory appeal under Section 107 of the GST Act with a condonation application. Without examining the tax merits, the Court declined writ jurisdiction and left it open to the appellate authority to consider the appeal and delay petition on their own merits, including the time spent before the writ court. en-us Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Jun 2026 07:26:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793189 A writ petition challenging a GST adjudication order was not entertained because it was filed more than 14 months after the order was uploaded on the portal and the petitioner showed no periodic portal checks or departmental follow-up. The Court held that lack of asserted knowledge did not excuse the delay, and that the proper remedy was to file a statutory appeal under Section 107 of the GST Act with a condonation application. Without examining the tax merits, the Court declined writ jurisdiction and left it open to the appellate authority to consider the appeal and delay petition on their own merits, including the time spent before the writ court. Case-Laws GST Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793189