<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1701 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469192</link>
    <description>Additional evidence was admitted because month-wise cash details, cash book extracts, profit and loss account, and interest ledger entries were material to determine the source of demonetisation-period cash deposits and the tax treatment of interest receipts. The cash deposit addition was remitted for de novo verification where business cash sales and regular deposits prima facie supported the assessee&#039;s explanation. The interest addition was also remitted because the records indicated the receipts had already been netted against interest expenditure, raising a double-addition issue. The substantive additions were therefore set aside for fresh adjudication after verification of the new material, with remaining grounds treated as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 13:43:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=906190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1701 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469192</link>
      <description>Additional evidence was admitted because month-wise cash details, cash book extracts, profit and loss account, and interest ledger entries were material to determine the source of demonetisation-period cash deposits and the tax treatment of interest receipts. The cash deposit addition was remitted for de novo verification where business cash sales and regular deposits prima facie supported the assessee&#039;s explanation. The interest addition was also remitted because the records indicated the receipts had already been netted against interest expenditure, raising a double-addition issue. The substantive additions were therefore set aside for fresh adjudication after verification of the new material, with remaining grounds treated as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>