<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 207 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52141</link>
    <description>Section 3A(4) of the Central Excise Act requires the Commissioner, on an assessee&#039;s claim, to determine actual production after giving an opportunity to produce evidence. RG-1 and RT-12 returns are not conclusive of actual production, but the Commissioner cannot reject the claim merely by reverting to annual capacity determination under section 3A(2) or by disregarding the assessee&#039;s material without proper enquiry. Where the existing material is insufficient, further records or evidence may be called for to reach a reasoned finding. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication and actual production had to be re-determined on the evidence adduced by both sides.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 16:00:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 207 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52141</link>
      <description>Section 3A(4) of the Central Excise Act requires the Commissioner, on an assessee&#039;s claim, to determine actual production after giving an opportunity to produce evidence. RG-1 and RT-12 returns are not conclusive of actual production, but the Commissioner cannot reject the claim merely by reverting to annual capacity determination under section 3A(2) or by disregarding the assessee&#039;s material without proper enquiry. Where the existing material is insufficient, further records or evidence may be called for to reach a reasoned finding. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication and actual production had to be re-determined on the evidence adduced by both sides.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52141</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>