https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52139 The appellate tribunal set aside the order, determining that LSLL was eligible for the duty drawback claimed. It concluded that the goods were not manufactured in a warehouse under Section 65 nor by an EOU under the exclusion clauses of the notifications. The tribunal allowed the appeal, ordering examination and processing of pending claims, providing LSLL with consequential benefits. en-us Fri, 03 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Oct 2010 15:50:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52139 The appellate tribunal set aside the order, determining that LSLL was eligible for the duty drawback claimed. It concluded that the goods were not manufactured in a warehouse under Section 65 nor by an EOU under the exclusion clauses of the notifications. The tribunal allowed the appeal, ordering examination and processing of pending claims, providing LSLL with consequential benefits. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 03 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52139