https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793058 The Delhi HC held that a claim for reimbursement of service tax and GST implication cost was not covered by the contract's arbitration clause. The clause was read as limited to disputes about specifications, design, drawings, instructions, workmanship, materials, and other execution-related issues, while the payment clause separately dealt with taxes and duties, including reimbursement of service tax on an actual basis. Applying the limited prima facie scrutiny at the Section 11(6) stage, the Court found that the parties had not agreed to arbitrate this tax reimbursement dispute and that its non-arbitrability was clear. No arbitrator was appointed. en-us Thu, 23 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Jun 2026 07:50:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793058 The Delhi HC held that a claim for reimbursement of service tax and GST implication cost was not covered by the contract's arbitration clause. The clause was read as limited to disputes about specifications, design, drawings, instructions, workmanship, materials, and other execution-related issues, while the payment clause separately dealt with taxes and duties, including reimbursement of service tax on an actual basis. Applying the limited prima facie scrutiny at the Section 11(6) stage, the Court found that the parties had not agreed to arbitrate this tax reimbursement dispute and that its non-arbitrability was clear. No arbitrator was appointed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 23 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793058