<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 443 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793062</link>
    <description>Extended period of limitation cannot be invoked again where an earlier show cause notice on substantially similar allegations had already been issued after investigation and the facts were already known to the department. On the same factual foundation, a later demand was treated as time-barred, as repeated reliance on the extended period was impermissible on disclosed or previously known facts. The demand was therefore barred by limitation and the appeal succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 07:50:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=906151" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 443 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793062</link>
      <description>Extended period of limitation cannot be invoked again where an earlier show cause notice on substantially similar allegations had already been issued after investigation and the facts were already known to the department. On the same factual foundation, a later demand was treated as time-barred, as repeated reliance on the extended period was impermissible on disclosed or previously known facts. The demand was therefore barred by limitation and the appeal succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793062</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>