<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 110 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52137</link>
    <description>Slag generated in the manufacture of ferro alloys was treated as a by-product arising in the course of manufacture, and the Tribunal followed its earlier view that similar slag obtained during manufacture of pig iron was not an excisable product. On that basis, the slag was held not liable to central excise duty. Once non-excisability was found, the exemption notification and the condition relating to Modvat credit did not require examination. The appeal was accordingly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 15:39:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 110 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52137</link>
      <description>Slag generated in the manufacture of ferro alloys was treated as a by-product arising in the course of manufacture, and the Tribunal followed its earlier view that similar slag obtained during manufacture of pig iron was not an excisable product. On that basis, the slag was held not liable to central excise duty. Once non-excisability was found, the exemption notification and the condition relating to Modvat credit did not require examination. The appeal was accordingly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>