https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793066 Writ petitions challenging Tribunal orders were held not maintainable because a specific statutory appellate remedy lay under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court accepted the preliminary objection that writ jurisdiction should not be used to bypass the alternate remedy, and directed the petitioner to pursue the appellate route instead. The papers were permitted to be taken back and presented as Civil Miscellaneous Appeals. en-us Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Jun 2026 07:50:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793066 Writ petitions challenging Tribunal orders were held not maintainable because a specific statutory appellate remedy lay under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court accepted the preliminary objection that writ jurisdiction should not be used to bypass the alternate remedy, and directed the petitioner to pursue the appellate route instead. The papers were permitted to be taken back and presented as Civil Miscellaneous Appeals. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793066