<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 452 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793071</link>
    <description>Refund of unutilized CENVAT credit under Rule 5 for exported services is governed by the prescribed formula, and one-to-one correlation between each input service and a specific export transaction is not required. Credit taken before the later time-limit restriction could not be denied on limitation grounds, and the refund claim filed within one year from export was not rejected on that basis. The unjust enrichment objection was not accepted on the facts, and the view that credit admissibility could not be examined in refund proceedings did not prevail in these circumstances. The claim was therefore treated as admissible with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 07:50:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=906142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 452 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793071</link>
      <description>Refund of unutilized CENVAT credit under Rule 5 for exported services is governed by the prescribed formula, and one-to-one correlation between each input service and a specific export transaction is not required. Credit taken before the later time-limit restriction could not be denied on limitation grounds, and the refund claim filed within one year from export was not rejected on that basis. The unjust enrichment objection was not accepted on the facts, and the view that credit admissibility could not be examined in refund proceedings did not prevail in these circumstances. The claim was therefore treated as admissible with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>