https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793076 Insider trading allegations under the proviso to Regulation 4(1) of the PIT Regulations concerned bona fide trades made while in possession of unpublished price sensitive information. The Tribunal had quashed the insider-trading finding and related market-access and association restraints, while sustaining the penalty for delayed disclosure of two trades under Regulation 7(2)(a). The Supreme Court declined to interfere with that outcome, clarified that it has no binding-precedent effect, and left the underlying question of law open. en-us Fri, 29 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Jun 2026 07:50:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793076 Insider trading allegations under the proviso to Regulation 4(1) of the PIT Regulations concerned bona fide trades made while in possession of unpublished price sensitive information. The Tribunal had quashed the insider-trading finding and related market-access and association restraints, while sustaining the penalty for delayed disclosure of two trades under Regulation 7(2)(a). The Supreme Court declined to interfere with that outcome, clarified that it has no binding-precedent effect, and left the underlying question of law open. Case-Laws SEBI Fri, 29 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793076