<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 458 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793077</link>
    <description>An importer may challenge enhancement of the assessable value of imported goods where no speaking order is on record. The Tribunal noted that acceptance of the enhanced price could not bar the challenge if the assessment was not supported by a reasoned order. In the absence of a speaking order under Section 17(5) of the Customs Act, 1962, the enhancement of value was held unsustainable, the declared value was accepted, and the impugned orders were set aside with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 07:50:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=906136" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 458 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793077</link>
      <description>An importer may challenge enhancement of the assessable value of imported goods where no speaking order is on record. The Tribunal noted that acceptance of the enhanced price could not bar the challenge if the assessment was not supported by a reasoned order. In the absence of a speaking order under Section 17(5) of the Customs Act, 1962, the enhancement of value was held unsustainable, the declared value was accepted, and the impugned orders were set aside with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>