<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 474 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793093</link>
    <description>Addition for alleged cash payment on purchase of immovable property could not be sustained where it was based only on a third party&#039;s search material and employee statements. The assessee denied any on-money payment, no independent corroborative evidence was produced, and cross-examination of the persons relied upon was not allowed. On that record, the material was insufficient to prove unexplained investment, and the addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 07:50:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=906120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 474 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793093</link>
      <description>Addition for alleged cash payment on purchase of immovable property could not be sustained where it was based only on a third party&#039;s search material and employee statements. The assessee denied any on-money payment, no independent corroborative evidence was produced, and cross-examination of the persons relied upon was not allowed. On that record, the material was insufficient to prove unexplained investment, and the addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>